Kafir Warrior

Hudna, Taqqiya, And Carter! Oh My!

2008-04-22T00:25:00.006-05:00

After making a total fool of himself by meeting with the Hamas terrorists as if they were legitimate leaders, former US president Jimmy Carter tried to save face by proclaiming that Hamas is willing to make a truce with Israel. Isn't that nice.

Carter, a typical delusional liberal collaborator with Islamofascism, came home bearing word of Hamas' "truce" like Neville Chamberlain returning from Germany waving his infamous Peace of Paper. Carter, anxious to believe in the goodwill of terrorists, thinks he's secured peace in the Middle East, or at least a viable step in that direction. What a buffoon!

If Jimmy Carter used the brain God gave him he'd know of the Islamic practice of hudna, whereby Muslims, when weak, are allowed to make a truce of no more than 10 years with their enemies. Guess how long Hamas' proposed "truce" with Israel is? Hamas doesn't have the slightest interest in peace. It's just buying time for the Palestinians to get strong enough to wipe Israel out. End of story.

But just in case Hamas promised Mr. Carter that it really does want an end to hostilities there's another Islamic practice I'm sure Carter chose not to know about. Muslims are allowed to lie to infidels in order to advance the cause of Allah. This practice, as many of you know, is called taqqiya. Taqqiya and hudna are a deadly combo. So, all Carter has to show for his "diplomacy" is how skillfully Muslims can play gullible Westerners predisposed to believe the worst about Israel and their own civilization.

Jimmy Carter is a disgrace to America, the West, and all kafirs. And he's dangerous. He's willing to sell out his culture to achieve a live-and-let-live peace the Muslims will never accept. The only peace they want is the peace of our conversion, submission, or death. It is the peace of global Islamic domination. And with leftard former presidents like Jimmy Carter lose in the world, they just might get it.

Fitna The Movie -Original English Version- [Part 1]

2008-03-31T15:06:00.001-05:00

You've heard of it, now see it!

I can't believe "Fitna", the anti-Islam film by Dutch PM Geert Wilders,is still on YouTube. But you can bet it won't be for long. Soon, I'm sure, YT will cave to the threats from peaceful Muslims like its British counterpart LiveLeak did. That's why I'm grabbing it for Kafir Warrior, so there will be a place for this warning to be seen by all us unbelievers who're the targets of Islamic imperialism.

God bless Geert Wilders for his courage and may He keep him safe from Mohammed's fanatics.

Fitna The Movie -Original English Version- [Part 2]

2008-03-31T14:59:00.001-05:00

Here's part two of the movie Muslims didn't want us kafirs to see. Now that we've seen it I hope us kafirs, the House of War as Mohammed's followers call us, will rise up in defense of our peoples, our faiths, and our lands. Islam MUST NOT take over the world!!!!! It will be a dark age from which mankind may never recover.

They Have Killed Again

2008-03-06T15:41:00.002-06:00

A gunman opened fire on a Jewish seminary in Jerusalem today, killing seven people. The militant Palestinian Islamic group Hamas, while not claiming responsiblity for the attack praised it saying, "We bless the [Jesusalem] operation" and promising it wouldn't be the last. Thousands of jubilant Gazans poured into the streets firing guns in the air in celebration. Sound familiar? It's the same thing those "moderate" Muslims did after the 9/11 attacks.

This attack was barbaric; it was intended to kill civilians and only civilians. The Muslim gunman, who was killed himself, was a war criminal. Hopefully Israel will have the balls to respond to this massacre of her people appropriately and without caring what an anti-Semitic world thinks. We kafirs, including Jews, have the God-given right and duty to defend our lives, our nations, our faiths, and our cultures against jihad. We must not submit to an Islamic order. That will be the death of our civilizations. I am one kafir not ready to disappear.

I Don't Believe It

2008-02-27T11:34:00.003-06:00

The Gallup polling group has just come out with a survey "proving" that the vast majority of Muslims aren't radical and condemn the 9/11 attacks on America. According to the poll 93% of Muslims worldwide are moderate while "only" 7% are radical. And the radicals, we're told, are that way because of politics not religion. Thus, Islam is absolved of being the inspiration for the horrors done in its name. How convenient. And that's why I don't believe this poll.

According to the Yahoo! News article, the Gallup survey was conducted to "[seek] to dispel the belief held by some in the West that Islam itself is the driving force for radicalism". In other words, the survey had a preconceived goal in mind. And just so us Westerners understand how ignorant of and prejudiced against Muslims we really are, the Gallup survey revealed that radical Muslims were no more religious than their moderate counterparts and even "believe in democracy more than the...moderates do". I'm not making this up.

I don't doubt that the Muslims who participated in this survey did say the positive things Gallup claims. The problem is that little doctrine called taqqiya* which allows Muslims to lie to kafirs to help Islam. I can't think of a better opportunity to practice taqqiya than this survey. Tell the Western kafirs what they desperately want to believe then let their media spread it all over the globe. Apologists for Islam can then seize on this poll to bolster their claims that Muhammad's religion is really peaceful and that the Koran quoting decapitators and suicide bombers are aberrations. Taqqiya has done its job.

We kafirs can't afford to take this survey at face value. Doing so could mean signing our own death certificate. We must keep our guard up and never forget the goal of the enemy we face. Muslims aim to conquer, convert, or kill us and any means are permissible to achieve that end. We must ALWAYS fight back, using the Muslims' means against them. Our very lives depend on it.

*I'm not sure of the spelling.

Ding! Dong! The Witch Is Dead!

2008-02-16T21:39:00.002-06:00

Well, not really. But if Saudi "justice" has it's way Fawaz Falih will have her head separated from her body for the crime of being a witch. The evidence against Falih, which included a confession the illiterate woman signed without knowing what it said and after being tortured, was flimsy to say the least. An appeals court did rule against the death penalty for Falih but a lower court reinstated it, apparently to send a message to all Saudis that they'd better not even think of casting spells in the Kingdom. The only thing that can save Falih now is a pardon from King Abdullah.

Where are the liberals on this one? Where are the wiccans and neo-pagans who attack Christianity at the drop of a hat? Why isn't Code Pink marching outside the Saudi embassy? Why isn't Rosie O'Donnell ranting against this on her blog? We all know why. It's like Ann Coulter said, the Left doesn't want to fight Islamic fundamentalism because doing so would "put them on the same side as the United States". How sad. There's at least one person who would love to be on the side of the United States. Let us pray that she'll get the chance. God save Fawaz Falih.

Jesus Over Muhammad!

2008-02-04T20:04:00.000-06:00

Christians are to be the superior religious group on the earth. The Quran says so! Don't believe me? Then check this out: Behold! Allah said: "O Jesus! I will take thee and raise thee to Myself and clear thee (of the falsehoods) of those who blaspheme; I will make those who follow thee superior to those who reject faith, to the Day of Resurrection. Then shall ye all return unto me, and I will judge between you of the matters wherein ye dispute." The Koran, 3:55 (emphasis added).

There it is, folks. The jihadis' own book says that Allah himself will make the followers of Jesus superior to unbelievers "to the Day of Resurrection", i.e., for a looooong time. All those Muslim fanatics marching around with signs saying "Islam will dominate the world!" and killing innocent people to achieve that goal need to reread their book. According to it they, the followers of Muhammad, are NOT destined to rule over unbelievers. That prestigious position is given to the Christians. Those jihadis had better start converting NOW!!!

Divorce, Saudi Style

2008-01-22T00:25:00.000-06:00

In Islam, at least the Saudi brand of Islam, you can be divorced at the behest of your family and not even know it. That's what happened to Fatima and Mansour al-Timani who, two years ago, opened their door to find police serving Mansour with papers telling him that his marriage had been annulled nearly a year earlier. Fatima's relatives had gotten the divorce on grounds that she'd married beneath the status of her extended family. The couple, who have two children, have been forced to live apart ever since.

Fatima and Mansour didn't take this assault on their marriage sitting down. They sued to reverse the ruling, publicized their case, and sought help from a Saudi human rights group. Finally, they fled to Jeddah on Saudi Arabia's coast and tried to live anonymously. Unfortunately, police soon found them there and arrested the couple for living together "illegally". Fatima was given the choice of living with her mother or going to jail; she chose jail. Mansour tried again to appeal the divorce decree but a Riyadh court ruled against him in 2007. Now, the couple's only hope is a pardon from King Abdullah. Is this insane or what?!

How are Islam's apologists going to defend this? It's culture, not Islam? It's fundamentalism, not true Islam? It's for women's protection? Let's face it. There IS no rationalization for this medieval practice. That your marriage could be stolen from you and you jailed, along with your children, for living with your "ex-spouse" is simply outrageous. But this is the mentality that Muslims are bringing into the kafir nations, especially the Western ones where Muslim immigration and birthrates are skyrocketing.

We kafirs must fight back! If we continue down our current appeasing, multiculturalist, pc road we will ensure the death of our civilizations. Islam will gain the ascendancy and we'll wake up in a world where our marriages are as sacrosanct and personal as toilet paper; where rape victims are jailed; where changing our religion is illegal; and where naming a toy after the "prophet" is a capital offense. Fatima and Mansour al-Timani are the proverbial canaries in the mine. How many more canaries will it take to rouse the kafir giant?

Bin Laden: Peace Activist?

2008-01-17T21:36:00.000-06:00

I just read something incredible on Yahoo! News. According to Yahoo! News the Associated Press has interviewed Osama bin Laden's son--or a guy claiming to be OBL's son--Omar bin Laden, and he says he wants to make peace between his father and the West. I'm not sure what to make of this.

First, I'm not sure I even believe that Omar, who claims he left Osama in Afghanistan in 2000, is the son of the Notorious OBL. Second, even if he is Osama's son I don't believe his peace offering. In the AP interview Omar says he was to be "an ambassador of peace" between Muslims and the West yet he refuses to denounce Osama, claiming that his Dad only wants to defend the Islamic people. How can Omar really want peace if he won't condemn his father's evil deeds?

Omar bin Laden says there's another way other than militancy to defend Islam. So does he think that Islam is under attack? And if so, by whom? The West? And if the West, just how is the West doing it? Every year millions of Muslims come to the West to live, work, and/or study. Is that an attack on Islam? Muslims in the West practice their religion more freely than they could in many Muslim countries, especially if they belong to minority Muslim sects. Is that an attack on Islam? I need to know if and how the West is attacking Islam before I'll buy the idea that Osama is just acting in self-defense.

And then there's the Islamic doctrine of hudna. Islam is imperialist. It's stated goal is world conquest. And in pursuit of that goal many strageties are permitted. A full frontal assault can be launched on the infidels when Muslims are strong, but when Muslims are weak a truce, or hudna, can be made with the infidels UNTIL THE MUSLIMS REGAIN THEIR STRENGTH. Thus, a hudna is NOT a genuine truce or peace treaty. Its purpose is NOT a permanent end to hostilities. Rather, a hudna is a ruse to convince the infidels to lay down their arms and their guard just long enough for the Muslims to get the upperhand on them. So I have to ask: Is Omar bin Laden really offering us peace, or just a hudna? I don't know for sure but my gut is telling me to beware of Muslims, especially those named bin Laden, bearing gifts.

Islam Must Die!!!!

2007-12-07T16:11:00.000-06:00

I am so upset I don't know what to do. I just saw a beheading! I think it was Nicholas Berg, but I'm not sure. It hardly matters who it was; what matters is that I saw the barbarism that is Islam with my own eyes. I saw a helpless, innocent human being have his head cut off. Not quickly and cleanly sliced off with a sharp sword or guillotine, which would've been bad enough. No, the Muslim filth cut their victim's head off with a knife, like you'd cut a piece of meat. I heard the victim groaning in agony; I saw his blood gush onto the floor. I'm sick to my stomach and sick to my heart.

This beheading video, and others just like it, was shown on the internet and all over the Arab/Muslim world. The reaction? Silence. Not a peep of criticism or protest from the good, moderate, peaceful Muslims we're constantly told to put our faith in. But what did ruffle their feathers? Cartoons! That's right. The good, moderate, peaceful Muslims rioted in the streets and murdered dozens of people after a Danish newspaper published hand drawn pictures of their "prophet". "Insult to Islam!", they screamed. Yet Muslims slaughtering a man the way most people wouldn't kill an animal is alright. No insult to Islam there. Not even using children to behead people insults their religion, judging from the moderates' silence about it.

I say to hell with moderate Muslims, their "prophet", and their religion. We in the House of War must rise up and put an end to Islam once and for all. As long as it exists we will have neither safety nor peace. Islam must die! It is spiritual smallpox that must be eradicated from the body of mankind. Putting Islam on the trash heap of history is the least we owe to its pitilessly murdered victims. It's what we owe to the man in the video, who's barbaric murder shook my soul.

Muhammad The Killer Bear

2007-11-30T19:18:00.000-06:00

Just in case you aren't convinced as to how insane Muslims are here's another horror story to enlightened you.

In Khartoum, Sudan British school teacher Gillian Gibbons was sentenced to 15 days in jail for allowing her second graders to name the class teddy bear Muhammad. Not satisfied with jail time some Sudanese are calling for Ms. Gibbons' execution. That's right, Muslims want this woman killed over a teddy bear.

Of course, Muslims will say that the issue isn't about a teddy bear but about "insulting" Islam, the teddy bear just being the object delivering the insult. But how, exactly, does it insult Islam to name a lovable toy after the Prophet? Couldn't that encourage children to associate Muhammad and Islam with all things good? If the kids in Gibbons' class had named a stuffed pit bull after Muhammad it might, might, be understandable if Muslims took offense, but a teddy bear? C'mon!

Muhammad is the most popular boys' name in the Muslim world. How many men named Muhammad live disgraceful lives? How many are drug dealers, rapists, wife beaters, or child molesters? Isn't that a much greater insult to Islam than naming an inanimate object, which can harm no one, after Islam's founder? Here's a suggestion for all you mad Muslims out there: if you really want to protect your religion's rep, stop naming your kids Muhammad and STOP DEMANDING A WOMAN BE KILLED OVER A TOY!!!!

Let it Begin with the Muslims

2007-11-11T02:28:00.000-06:00

Land for peace. That catchy ditty has been played at least since Jimmy Carter negotiated the "peace" treaty between Egypt and Israel back in the '70's. The idea behind it is that the Palestinians--and other Arabs/Muslims--will love Israel if only she would give them just a little land for a state of their own. Really, that's all the Palestinians are asking for. Just a little land for (just a little) peace. Well, I say that if "land for peace" is such a good thing let the Muslims start it.

You see, the largest ethnic group in the world without a state of its own is NOT the Palestinians but the Kurds. The Kurds number at least 30 million, scattered over five countries: Turkey, Syria, Iraq, Iran, and Russia. As you can see, four of the five countries are Muslim, like the Kurds themselves. If Muslim countries are so agrieved over the Palestinians not having their own country, shouldn't they be even more agrieved that the 30 million strong Kurds don't have one? Don't bet on it. Not only are the four Muslim countries not sympathetic to the Kurds, they have violently persecuted them for ages. And since the Kurds and their persecutors are all Muslim, the only reason for the oppression has to be racial hatred.

The Kurds are ethnically, culturally, and linguistically distinct from the people amongst whom they live. It's obvious that the non-Kurds hate their Kurdish neighbors, so why not try the solution always proposed for the Israelis? Why don't Turkey, Syria, Iraq, and Iran give up chunks of their land to form a Kurdish state? After all, they'd be helping out their Muslim "brothers" instead of shooting them. Everybody benefits. The Turks, Syrians, Iraqis and Iranians would be rid of a troublesome minority and the Kurds would have freedom from racial oppression PLUS the dignity that comes with being a sovereign people. Sounds like a win/win situation to me. So the next time you hear Muslims whining that terrorism is caused by the Palestinian problem, ask them what their solution to the Kurdish problem is. Then tell them that, like charity, trading land for peace should begin at home.

Islam IS The Enemy

2007-10-24T11:49:00.001-05:00

I just read a long and interesting comment on my post, "The House of War", written by Muslims Against Sharia (their site is in the link field). The gist of the comment is that not all Muslims are radicals. MAS insists that moderate Muslims exist and the real difference between them and the radicals is that the moderates reject not only the radicals' methods but also their ultimate goal of world Islamic domination.

I agree with MAS, that's why I put them and the American Islamic Forum for Democracy, run by Zuhdi Jasser, on this blog. I believe that there are moderate Muslims and that they should be recognized and commended when they speak out; I don't believe that Islam is moderate. That's the issue I feel moderate Muslims haven't honestly dealt with. Let me explain it this way.

Suppose a group of radical Nazis committed, in the name of Naziism, a terrible terrorist attack against Jews, killing thousands. In response a group of moderate Nazis start an organization to speak out against the radicals. The moderates insist that they oppose not just the radicals' methods but also their goal of world Nazi domination, and they are sincere. The problem is that Mein Kampf, the holy book of Naziism, teaches not only that Naziism must conquer the world but that Jews must be killed in the process. Clearly, moderate Nazis must reject that doctrine in order to be moderate. But if the moderates reject a fundamental tenet of their professed faith, how can they have any credibility in the larger Nazi community?

And what about the moderates' children? Raised to believe they were Nazis, they'll inevitably see the disconnect between what their parents claim is Naziism and what Mein Kampf says is Naziism. Intellectual honesty--and teenage rebellion--will force them to make a crucial choice. Either they'll reject Naziism all together, rather than continuing to practice the watered down version of their parents; or, they'll become more "pious" and start doing what Mein Kampf, the only authority on Nazi practice, tells them Nazis should do. If they go the latter route more Jews, moderate Nazis, and other "enemies" of Naziism will die. And their parents' attempt at moderation in a fundamentally radical and violent faith will have failed. Do you see the lesson in this parable?

Many Muslims are neither radical nor violent but that is inspite of their faith, not because of it. Moderate Muslims are kidding themselves if they think they're following true, Koranic Islam. They are democratic, pro-human rights, and peaceful; Islam is not. Mohammed's religion can't be moderated; it is inherently imperialist and violent, and as long as it exists there's the risk that someone will take its teachings seriously and act on them, waging endless war. That's why I say Islam is the enemy. It must be fought until it's as defeated and discredited as Naziism. Then and only then will there be the beginning of peace in the world.

Down with jihad! Victory to the House of War!

The Difference, Part 3

2007-09-25T20:47:00.000-05:00

What's the difference between Jesus and Mohammed? "Jesus raised the dead; Mohammed killed the living."* That's the difference between Jesus and Mohammed. Any questions?

*Quote from the book "Secrets of the Koran", by Don Richardson.

The House of War

2007-09-24T17:52:00.000-05:00

It's not well known but Islam, that strange cult that even President Bush insists on calling "a religion of peace", divides the whole of humanity into two parts: Dar al Islam or the House of Islam, and Dar al Harb or the House of War. Guess which house you and I are in.

The House of Islam is that part of humanity that is Muslim or subjugated by Muslims. The House of War is that part of humanity that is not. This stark division reveals the inherently intolerant and violent nature of the Islamic worldview. Don't be confused or deceived. In Islam if you're not a Muslim you're the enemy. The duty of all true Muslims is to convert you or, failing that, subjugate or kill you. Yes, kill you!

We in the kafir nations, especially the Western ones, must understand that we are the House of War; we are at war with Islam, NOT because we choose to be, but because that is how Muslims define us. Simply being non-Muslim is an act of aggression to them because it's seen as rejecting Islam, Muslims not being able to understand that choosing to practice another faith is not automatically an insult to theirs. This is how Muslims throughout history have been able to claim that their myriad wars of conquest were fought in "self-defense".

Like it or not, kafirs, we are in a life and death struggle. It is a struggle not only for the survival of our physical lives but also for our political, cultural and religious lives. It is a struggle for the right to live FREELY as non-Muslims, without paying Muslim overlords tribute in order to be left alone. It is a struggle as old as Islam itself; a struggle faced by every "infidel" who was unwilling to convert or accept second-class status in a Muslim empire. As long as there's Islam, we will have to fight to exist. Accept it: we are the House of War. Take up your sword and FIGHT!

Atefah's Story, Part 6

2007-09-22T01:17:00.001-05:00

The end of the tragic story of Atefah Sahaaleh, a 16-year-old girl hanged by the Islamic Republic of Iran for "crimes against chastity". And to think that the leader of this oppresive country has been invited to speak at Columbia University! I hope he will be greeted with cries of "Atefah! Atefah!"

Atefah Sahaaleh must not have died in vain. We owe it to her to fight Islam and ANY attempt to sneak Sharia law into our lands. No other young girl should be murdered by the state because she was sexually abused by an older man.

Fight Sharia Law! Fight Islam! Remember Atefah! Our daughters will one day have nooses around their necks if we don't.

God bless the House of War!

Atefah's Story, Part 5

2007-09-18T11:18:00.001-05:00

Welcome to the 7th century. Hanging teenagers who've been raped or sexually expoilted. This is what Islam has in store for the world. Where are the feminists when we need them?!

Atefah's Story, Part 4

2007-09-16T17:57:00.001-05:00

Here's the deal folks: if you get raped in an Islamic country, YOU get executed and your rapist gets off with a flogging. And Osama bin Laden wants us to convert to THAT?!

Atefah's Story, Part 3

2007-09-11T00:31:00.001-05:00

Atefah's Story, the story of Iranian barbarism, continues.

Atefah's Story, Part 2

2007-09-09T21:05:00.001-05:00

The continuing tragedy of Atefah Sahaaleh. Welcome to The Islamic Republic of Iran--a country where 13-year-olds are flogged for acting 13 and the age of consent for girls is nine. NINE. And they call us decadent!!

Atefah's Story, Part 1

2007-09-08T01:44:00.001-05:00

For all those who think that radical Islam is no threat to humanity; for all those who believe that all problems in the Middle East are caused by American foreign policy; for all those with an irrational faith in the goodwill of the Islamic Republic of Iran, watch this video!

The 2004 execution of 16-year-old Atefah Sahaaleh for having premarital sex is a brutal reminder of the brutal nature of Sharia Law. If you don't understand why we must win the war against jihad, Atefah's Story will make it clear to you. And if it doesn't, heaven help you.

The Difference, Part 2

2007-09-07T23:31:00.000-05:00

What's the difference between America and Islamic countries? In America if a man rapes a father's daughter the father kills the rapist. In Islamic countries if a man rapes a father's daughter the father kills the daughter. That's the difference between America and Islamic countries. Got it?

Cowardly Koreans

2007-09-03T11:24:00.001-05:00

In the fight against jihad all kafir nations must be resolute in the face of Islamic barbarism. Remember, this is an international struggle. The jihadis are not fighting only America as some wishfully think. No, the jihadis hate ALL "infidels", i.e. non-Muslims, and are fighting to either convert, conquer, or kill us all. Every kafir is a warrior in this struggle because the jihadis have targeted all of us, whether we like it or not. Any capitulation by one kafir nation endangers all kafir nations. That's why the deal made with the Taliban by South Korea (SK) is so disturbing.

If you recall, the Taliban kidnapped and held hostage 23 Korean Christians doing humanitarian work in Afghanistan. After the Taliban murdered two of the Koreans, the SK government brokered a deal with them that ended the crisis. The remaining Koreans were released on condition that SK withdraw its 200 troops from, and end missionary work in, Afghanistan. While its completely understandable that South Korea wanted her people home safely, her surrender to violent Muslims and total disregard for the dangerousness of the precedent she set is beyond shameful.

Understand what happened with this deal. South Korea caved in to the Taliban, and the Taliban know it. Already they've promised more kidnappings and killings of foreigners from countries with troops in Afghanistan. The tactic worked with SK and the Taliban fully expect it to work with other nations. To save the lives of her own people, South Korea willingly endangered the lives of other nations' people. Such self-centeredness and disunity will cripple the kafir nations' struggle against jihad. And that's just what the jihadis want.

We kafirs must be united if we're going to win the war against resurgent Islam. As I stated above, Muslims won't be satisfied until ALL kafirs are converted, subjugated, or killed. Caving in to their blackmail won't save us. It won't even buy us time. As soon as we capitulate once the jihadis will immediately demand more concessions. Unlike us they know exactly what they're fighting for, global Islamic domination, and are singlemindedly committed to victory.

We, the kafir nations, must face the unpleasant truth that our appeasement just won't work. We must abandon our irrational hope that radical Muslims can be changed by our goodwill. They can't. South Korea's troops were working as doctors and engineers; they were helping the Afghan people, as were the missionaries. But to the Taliban they were infidels deserving of only one thing: death.

My desperate hope is that the kafir nations will learn the lesson they need to learn from South Korea's cowardly surrender and its dangerous results. If we don't we'll be singing the song of the minaret, and sooner than we think. Forbid it, almighty God!

Hamas Children Come Out To Play

2007-08-19T00:14:00.001-05:00

So THIS is how Muslims rock out. Hilarious! (And a little scary, too.)

Hamas education for kids

2007-08-18T23:22:00.001-05:00

I guess this is how Hamas fighters developed their "superior discipline and skill", as former president Jimmy Carter called it.

The Difference

2007-08-14T23:15:00.000-05:00

What's the difference between Christianity and Islam? In Christianity martyrs die for their faith; in Islam martyrs kill for their faith. That's the difference. Got it?

Baby Beheader

2007-04-24T11:02:00.000-05:00

Last night, while watching The Glenn Beck Show (TGBS), I got a shocking reminder of the evil that is Islam. In the segment called The Real Story, Glenn Beck, the host of TGBS, revealed the existence of a video showing the beheading of an accused American spy in Afghanistan. What made this video more horrifying than usual is that the beheader was a little boy no more than 12 years old. That's right. Muslims are now getting their children to do their monstrous work.

Glenn Beck stated that the video, shown on Al-Arabiya television, would never be shown in America. On his show Beck could only show two photos taken from the video, one of the boy beheader and one of his blindfolded victim. American news stations justified their refusal to air the footage on the grounds that doing so would only encourage more beheadings. Gee, I wonder what's encouraged all of the beheadings there've been so far? Could it be Islam? I know, I'm not supposed to even think of such a question, let alone ask it out loud. But I will ask it out loud.

I'm sick and tired of this slavish devotion to a corrupt multiculturalism that prevents the West from naming its enemies and revealing the evil that they do. The jihadis are now using their own children--children!--to commit murder, to the cheers of warped adults. The jihadis march in the streets of London and other Western cities openly proclaiming their plan to destroy Europe and the West. BEHEAD THOSE WHO MOCK ISLAM, EUROPE YOU WILL PAY YOUR 9/11 IS ON ITS WAY, and PREPARE FOR THE REAL HOLOCAUST read some of their signs. They do this and we do nothing. To object in any way is to be racist, we're told. So, to prove our anti-racist credentials, we ignore, excuse, and even enable the Muslims who want our heads.

None of this appeasement will save us. The Muslims mean to wipe Western, Christian civilization off the map and replace it with a global Islamic state. They will do anything and everything to achieve that goal because they believe Allah wills it. If you don't think so, remember the baby beheader in Afghanistan. Decapitating the "spy" was only the beginning; his next stop will be London, Amsterdam, or Washington, D.C., and he'll be coming after you and me. Let him taste steel when he comes.

Protect us, O God, from the wrath of the Muslims!

Merry Christmas!

2006-12-21T16:35:00.000-06:00

Merry Christmas everyone and a Happy New Year! May 2007 be the year when the West gets back its spine!

Benedict, Don't Grovel in Turkey!

2006-11-28T10:26:00.000-06:00

Pope Benedict XVI is now making a historic visit to Muslim Turkey, only the third such visit by a pope. The purpose of the trip is to meet with Bartolomew I, leader of the world's 300 million Eastern Orthodox Christians, and promote reunion between Othodox Christians and Catholics. The trip was planned well before the Pope angered the Muslim world be quoting the anti-Islamic remarks of a medieval emperor, but the buzz is that Benedict will use the trip to smooth over Muslims' ruffled feathers.

I say no! Instead of retreating yet again in the face of Islamic militantcy the pontiff should use this historic moment to boldly stand for the West and the Christian faith he's supposed to represent. Pope Benedict XVI should fearlessly and unapologetically remind Muslims that Christianity was in Turkey centuries before Islam. He should also condemn their centuries of unprovoked aggression against the West, reminding Muslims of the hard truth that they, in fact, were the first crusaders.

The Pope is on solid ground, literally, to say such things; Turkey is full of Christian history. The seven churches of Asia addressed in the Book of Revelation were all located in Asia Minor, now Turkey. Istanbul used to be named Constantinople, after the first Christian Roman emperor, and was the capital of the eastern Roman Empire. The Hagia Sophia, one of the greatest feats of Western architecture, was a Christian church for over 1000 years before it was converted into a mosque after the Muslim conquest of Constantinople in 1453. The great building is now a museum. I bet the real history of Muslim aggression against Westerners and all other "infidels" isn't in that museum.

Someone has to be the defender of the Faith and defender of the West. Pope Benedict XVI, indeed any pope, is the perfect person for that job. That should be why the papacy exists. Unfortunately the Pope, like so many other Westerners, is a servant of political correctness and unilateral tolerance more than Christ. He'll go to Turkey and preach about interfaith dialogue and brotherhood and refuse to accept that Islam is a religion that fervently rejects both, and he'll think he's doing Christ's work. Meanwhile Islamic militants, unmoved by the Pope's pretty words, will continue their global jihad until the crescent reigns supreme. And if that day comes there will be no more doing Christ's work. So I plead with you, Pope Benedict, speak the truth in Turkey! Stand for your civilization and your God! For if you don't, St. Peter's Basilica will become another Hagia Sophia. God forbid it!

The Queen Sells Out

2006-10-13T12:19:00.000-05:00

Queen Elizabeth II of England has sold out her country, heritage, and faith.

On Saturday, September 30, Her Majesty designated an office in Windsor Castle for use as a prayer room for Muslims during the "holy" month of Ramadan. Such a room also exists in Buckingham Palace. The prayer room at Windsor Castle was set up at the request of a 19-year-old Muslim girl, Nagina Chaudry, who works in the Castle's visitors' shop. Miss Chaudry said it was "great knowing that [the Queen] respects other people's faith" and that she was thrilled that "[the Queen] is going to such great lenghts for me." Somebody get me a barf bag, please!

For all those who don't know, Queen Elizabeth II is the head of the Church of England and Defender of the Faith, i.e, Christianity. To allow a Muslim prayer room in any of her castles during this time of resurgent Muslim aggression against the West is a betrayal of her duty as monarch of a Western and Christian nation. I know the British sovereign is supposed to be above politics, but even an apolitical figurehead still has a duty to act with principle. I can't imagine the Queen's parents, King George VI and Queen Elizabeth, allowing a room in Windsor Castle or Buckingham Palace to be used for Nazi ceremonies during WWII. Yet today, 60 years later, their daughter is caving to political correctness and multiculturalism when what her subjects need most is a monarch with the conviction to stand for Christian Britain.

I don't know what Queen Elizabeth II thinks Britain will get out of her capitulation. Sure, Miss Chaudry may be grateful, but will this gesture change the mind of Osama bin Ladin? Will it change the minds of Hamas, Hezboallah, or Islamic Jihad? Will any radical Muslim cleric tell his mosque mates that, because of the prayer rooms in Windsor Castle and Buckingham Palace, Britain is a friend of Islam and no longer a legitimate target for their holy war? HELL NO!!!!!!!!!! The jihadis will interpret this latest retreat by a Western leader the way they interpret all such retreats: as a sign of weakness. They will be further convinced that they are winning this war and will be emboldened to keep fighting until the call of the minaret is the only religion on British soil.

The next time some Muslim employee asks the Queen to respect her religion, I hope Her Majesty will have the courage to say that she'll make Islamic prayer rooms in her castles as soon as Muslim monarchs start making Christian prayer rooms in theirs. After all, respect should be a two-way street. That's how we do it in the West.

God save the Queen.

Enough With the Groveling!

2006-09-26T11:30:00.000-05:00

Pope Benedict the XVI is still trying to smooth out the Islamic feathers his quoting of a Byzantine emperor ruffled a week ago. Yesterday the Pontiff met with twenty--twenty!--representatives of Islamic nations to virtually apologize for quoting that medieval ruler. I say, ENOUGH! Enough of this groveling with a captital "G"! When are we Westerners going to learn that no amount of frightened-dog groveling and/or apologizing will ever satisfy Muslims? Why do we insist on believing that if we just bend over backwards to show respect for Islam then everything will be ok and we can go back to living our cozy, comfortable lives?

When 3000 Americans were killed on 9/11, did any Muslim ruler have an audience with Western leaders to assure them and their people that the attack was an abomination that had nothing to do with real Islam? Did any Muslim ruler have such an audience with Western leaders after the Madrid train bombings or the London subway and bus bombings? No, no, and again, no. Let's remember what Muslims did do after 9/11: they danced in the streets. They passed out candy to their children and cheered. That's what they did. And we're supposed to just accept it. But if one of us merely criticizes Islam or Muhammad our property can be firebombed and we can be murdered. And we're supposed to just accept that, too.

I say, NO! It's time to start telling Muslims the truth whether they like it or not. It's time to stand firmly and bravely against their ultimate goal--the global imposition of Sharia law. It's time to boldly proclaim that they are the real imperialists and that the West is the shining shield of civilization protecting humanity from Koranic darkness. Westerners, we are at war for our very survival and our way of life is worth defending. So, to paraphrase Sonny Corleone, no more trying to patch things up; it's time to WIN!!!

This Is the Religion of Peace

2006-09-19T12:07:00.000-05:00

The religion of peace strikes again.

In an effort to show how loving and misunderstood by Westerners Islam really is, apoplectic Mohammedans rioted, vandalized, threatened Christians, and murdered a nun in reaction to the Pope's quoting of a medievel emperor's criticism of Islam. Gee, I feel so much better seeing the peace and tolerance of Islam.

Apparently in peaceful Islam--the true Islam--riots and murders are the proper response to critical words but not to the slaughter of innocent people. Oh no. When people are actually killed it's party time--if those people are infidels. And everyone who's not a Muslim is an infidel.

Moderate Muslims will claim that the rioters, vandals, and killers don't represent true Islam, but if that's so why don't these moderates ever take to the streets in angry protest against the extremists they say are distorting their faith? Perhaps because there are no really moderate Muslims. Maybe "moderate" Muslims are just Muslims who disagree with the methods of the militants but not with their objectives. And because the "moderates" and the militants do have the same objectives, the "moderates" aren't going to make too much of a fuss about the methods, no matter how violent they may be.

Or maybe there are moderate Muslims, but they're scared stiff of the militants and don't want to risk their lives to oppose them. Either way, Islam will continue to be "misunderstood" by Westerners as long as Muslims keep behaving the way they've been for the last few days. And I expect them to do just that.

Welcome to the religion of peace.

Rudolf Hess Revisted

2006-09-07T12:40:00.000-05:00

On May 10, 1941, during the Blitz on London, Nazi Rudolf Hess flew to England in hopes of persuading King George VI to sack prime minister Winston Churchill, make peace with Germany and then join Germany in a war against the Soviet Union. Of course Hess failed, but his action has inspired today's sand Nazis to try a similar stunt of their own.

Former Iranian president Mohammed Khatami is coming to America. He is scheduled to speak in the National Cathedral and, on the eve of the 5th anniversary of 9/11, at Harvard. In fact, Harvard invited Khatami to speak as part of a conference on, of all things, tolerance. We really are living in bizarro world.

While current Iranian president Ahmadinejad calls for the extermination of Israel and demands that the US bow down to Iranian "greatness", former president Khatami tries to play good cop by coming to America to discuss tolerance. I hope that most Americans are savvy enough not to buy this Muslim maniac's mutterings, but I fear that a significant segment of my people are not. For unlike in the days of WWII, many Americans, and other Westerners, now are consumed with the twin poisons of multiculturalism and guilt over racism/colonialism, and don't really believe that America and the West are worth defending. Thus, they are eager to swallow any propaganda, no matter the source, if it will free them from having to acknowledge and confront the evil of militant Islam.

I don't know exactly what sand Nazi Khatami will say in the Cathedral or at Harvard. I'm certain, though, it'll be something that will have the "Blame America First" crowd cheering. Today's sand Nazis learned much from their predecessors but they've gone one better: they've learned how to make us hate ourselves more than we hate them. That's their most powerful weapon against us; even Rudolf Hess didn't have it. It's time we deployed an equally powerful defense. Truth.

It's NOT Us!!!!

2006-08-30T11:28:00.000-05:00

One of the most common justifications for attacks on America given by Muslim terrorists is America's foreign policy, especially her support for Israel. The idea goes something like this: if America wouldn't support Israel, which is supposedly brutalizing Arabs/Muslims, Muslims wouldn't have to fight against her. This idea has caught on in Europe and is catching on among left-wing, "anti-war" people in America. This "it's America's foreign policy" argument is just a variation on the Left's "Blame America First" ideology, and I say bullcrap to all of it. The only people who are to blame for Islamic terrorism are Muslims; the only belief system to blame for Islamic terrorism is Islam. Don't think so? Then consider this.

For centuries the British oppressed the Irish people and are still doing so, some feel, in Northern Ireland. The Irish have grievances against Britain that go far deeper than any grievances the Palestinians have against Israel. The Irish Republican Army, or IRA, began its most well-known campaign, called The Troubles, against the British in the late 1960's, carrying out all manner of terrorist attacks the most infamous of which was the murder of Prince Charles' uncle, Lord Mountbatten. During that time America was ( and remains) Britain's stauchest ally, condemning the IRA's killing sprees and giving the British government great moral support. But the IRA never attacked America. Not once in the history of The Troubles did IRA terrorists bomb an American embassy, assassinate an American diplomat, kidnap American citizens, or hijack American planes and fly them into the World Trade Center. The IRA never did any of these things and then justified them by pointing to America's alliance with Britain.

The question, of course, is why not. The answer is that IRA terrorists weren't Muslim terrorists. The IRA understood that its beef was with the British government alone, and not with every government allied with Britain. And why did the IRA understand that? Because it didn't, and doesn't, follow an imperialist religion that compels its believers to violently convert the world. And make no mistake, that's what Islamic terrorism is really about: global conquest.

The goal is nothing less than conversion of all people to Islam and the total subjugation or elimination of those who won't. The Palestinian-Israeli conflict is just an excuse for a global jihad that Islamists would be waging anyway; it's something the Islamists can whine about to their leftist, secular sympathizers who just wouldn't understand their religious motives. But the cold, hard truth is that Islamists would hate America and the West even if Israel and all their other grievances didn't exist. They hate us because their religion tells them to and we'd better drop our pc blinders and face up to that fact or we won't have a snowball's chance in hell of saving our civilization.

Quotable Quotes: On Victory

2006-08-18T12:26:00.000-05:00

"Our enemies...need to be destroyed, not contained." Glenn Beck, The Glenn Beck Show, Wednesday, Aug. 17, 2006

Horror in India

2006-07-13T13:40:00.000-05:00

The train bombings in Mumbai, India two days ago were just horrible. People can't get on trains anywhere in the world without having to worry that some wackos want to kill them.

The verdict is still out on who did this terrible crime, although India has arrested two suspects with distinctly Islamic sounding names. And the whole operation has Islamic fingerprints all over it. Still, India has had problems with different segments of its multi-ethnic, multi-religious population, most notably the Sikhs, so I'm not going to jump to conclusions and say for sure that Muslims are responsible for this horror (but it sure smells like radical Islam).

If it turns out that Muslims are the culprits, these bombings will be a big headache to those in the West who say that American foreign policy is the cause of Islamic terrorism. After all, India isn't doing any of the things that Western "peace" advocates say is the cause of Muslims' anti-American/anti-Western rage. India doesn't have troops in Iraq; she doesn't have troops in Saudi Arabia. India isn't a big friend of Israel, nor a big supporter of corrupt, secular Arab governments. About the only thing going against India is that she's fighting Muslim Pakistan for control of Kashmir, but the fate of Kashmir is rarely, if ever, mentioned by radical Muslims in their railings against America and the West.

So, if Muslims did indeed bomb the trains in Mumbai on Tuesday, what are the "peace" advocates going to make of it? Gee, maybe they'll have to actually consider the possibility that maybe, just maybe, Islam causes Islamic terrorism. Now that's a radical idea!

Happy Birthday, America!

2006-07-05T11:05:00.000-05:00

Happy Birthday, America! I hope everyone had a happy, fun-filled 4th!

We Got the Bastard!

2006-06-08T10:20:00.000-05:00

Ding! Dong! The Nazi's dead!

Which Nazi?

The sand Nazi!

Ding! Dong! The sand Nazi is dead!

Hail to our airmen! On intelligence provided by Jordan our brave fighters launched an airstrike that successfully killed badly wanted terrorist Al-Zarqawi (I don't remember his first name and don't care to) and seven of his "spiritual" advisors. Oh happy day!!!!!!!

All Zarqawi brought to Iraq was death and destruction. He didn't build one school, staff one hospital, repair one water pipe, or bring electricity to one home. No, he and his followers maniacally fought every effort by America and the coalition to do the above mentioned things and make life better for all Iraqis. So it is a tremendous blessing for Iraq, America, and the world that this sorry excuse for a human being is dead (and he ain't gettin' any virgins in hell). Hopefully, this gift of Zarqawi's death will inspire Iraqis to work for a future for their country and life, not "martydom", for their children.

I know that Zarqawi's death won't mean that the Iraq war will be over soon. Tomorrow our troops--God bless 'em!-- will be back to the hard and dangerous task of killing Zarqawi wannabes. But today I, and hopefully many others worldwide, will take some time out to, as it says in one of the Psalms, "dance in the blood of the wicked".

Hooah!

Osama the Racist

2006-04-25T12:12:00.000-05:00

You've all heard by now of Osama bin Laden's (OBL) new taped message. In it the Sultan of Savagery accused the West of waging a war on Islam--what else is new?--and pointed to the West's financial embargo of the Palestininans' new Hamas government as "proof". OBL is a nut and maybe, if you think about it, a racist, too.

Yes, America and the EU cut off the Hamas government financially, but how does that equate to a war on Islam? It doesn't, unless you believe that Arab Muslims are the only Muslims that matter, and that's just what OBL seems to think. How else to explain his view that cutting off Hamas means attacking Islam, even when the West maintains diplomatic and financial relations with non-Arab Muslim countries? And what about OBL's support for the murderous, Arab Muslim regime in Sudan?

In his taped message, OBL called on his supporters to join the jihad in Sudan. What he didn't mention is the fact that Sudan's Arab government is, and has been for years, waging genocide not only against black Sudanese Christians in the south, but also, in Darfur, against black Sudanese Muslims. So, in OBL's world, it's not enough to be Muslim to be the good guy, you have to be Arab and Muslim to count. All you non-Arab Muslims who think that OBL is on your side, think again. All you Black Muslims in America who believe that Islam is inherently non-racist, think again. OBL thinks opposing Arab Hamas means opposing all of Islam. OBL supports the genocidal killing of blacks in Sudan. That makes him a racist in my book. What does it make him in yours?

This Is Sharia

2006-03-27T12:32:00.000-06:00

The case of Afghan Christian Abdul Rahman illustrates why so many people in the West fear Islam.

Rahman converted to Christianity 16 years ago while working in Germany. The new "democratic" Afghan government, whose constitution guarantees freedom of religion, is now trying him for the "crime" of converting from Islam. If found guilty, Mr. Rahman will be executed according to Sharia law. To be fair, Afghan president Harmid Karzai is trying to save Mr. Rahman's life, but the hardline mullahs who control the judicial system insist that Mr. Rahman must die for "humiliating Allah".

I hope all those moderate Muslims whom everyone keeps talking about but no one ever sees will finally get a voice and speak out against this outrage. This case shows that there is and can be no real religious, or any other kind of freedom, where Sharia rules. If Muslims think that those Danish cartoons insulted their faith, what do they think Westerners will make of executing someone for converting from one religion to another? Such an act will create far more animosity toward Islam than a few amaturish drawings ever could.

Let's be reasonable, or is reason verboten in Islam? Mr. Rahman converted to Christianity over a decade ago. If Allah was humiliated by that act don't you think he would've done something about it then? And how, exactly, does Mr. Rahman's conversion humiliate Allah? If his conversion was the result of deep soul searching and careful study of Islam's and Christianity's competing claims, isn't is possible that Allah might be pleased to see one of his creations using the brain that he gave him? Even if Mr. Rahman's conversion was purely mercenary, how does that humiliate Allah? Does it stop other Muslims from practicing their faith? Does it stop non-Muslims from converting to Islam? No, and no.

Muslims have grown in number since Mr. Rahman's conversion. There has been no loss to the dar al Islam because one man opted to think for himself and chose another faith. And that's what this is really all about. Mr. Rahman isn't facing execution for converting to Christianity; he's facing execution for thinking independently. Sharia is about punishing freedom of thought. Now the world knows that, and that really is a loss for Islam.

Welcome to Kafir Warrior!

2006-03-25T15:02:00.000-06:00

Welcome to Kafir Warrior! On this blog I'm going to express my dislike for Islam or, at least, certain parts of it, and explain why I feel that way. I also hope to educate my readers about the real history of Islam's interaction with the non-Islamic world and why the current clash of civilizations is NOT the West's fault. So again, welcome to Kafir Warrior, fighting Islam right!