Ding! Dong! The Nazi's dead!
Which Nazi?
The sand Nazi!
Ding! Dong! The sand Nazi is dead!
Hail to our airmen! On intelligence provided by Jordan our brave fighters launched an airstrike that successfully killed badly wanted terrorist Al-Zarqawi (I don't remember his first name and don't care to) and seven of his "spiritual" advisors. Oh happy day!!!!!!!
All Zarqawi brought to Iraq was death and destruction. He didn't build one school, staff one hospital, repair one water pipe, or bring electricity to one home. No, he and his followers maniacally fought every effort by America and the coalition to do the above mentioned things and make life better for all Iraqis. So it is a tremendous blessing for Iraq, America, and the world that this sorry excuse for a human being is dead (and he ain't gettin' any virgins in hell). Hopefully, this gift of Zarqawi's death will inspire Iraqis to work for a future for their country and life, not "martydom", for their children.
I know that Zarqawi's death won't mean that the Iraq war will be over soon. Tomorrow our troops--God bless 'em!-- will be back to the hard and dangerous task of killing Zarqawi wannabes. But today I, and hopefully many others worldwide, will take some time out to, as it says in one of the Psalms, "dance in the blood of the wicked".
Hooah!
Thursday, June 08, 2006
Tuesday, April 25, 2006
Osama the Racist
You've all heard by now of Osama bin Laden's (OBL) new taped message. In it the Sultan of Savagery accused the West of waging a war on Islam--what else is new?--and pointed to the West's financial embargo of the Palestininans' new Hamas government as "proof". OBL is a nut and maybe, if you think about it, a racist, too.
Yes, America and the EU cut off the Hamas government financially, but how does that equate to a war on Islam? It doesn't, unless you believe that Arab Muslims are the only Muslims that matter, and that's just what OBL seems to think. How else to explain his view that cutting off Hamas means attacking Islam, even when the West maintains diplomatic and financial relations with non-Arab Muslim countries? And what about OBL's support for the murderous, Arab Muslim regime in Sudan?
In his taped message, OBL called on his supporters to join the jihad in Sudan. What he didn't mention is the fact that Sudan's Arab government is, and has been for years, waging genocide not only against black Sudanese Christians in the south, but also, in Darfur, against black Sudanese Muslims. So, in OBL's world, it's not enough to be Muslim to be the good guy, you have to be Arab and Muslim to count. All you non-Arab Muslims who think that OBL is on your side, think again. All you Black Muslims in America who believe that Islam is inherently non-racist, think again. OBL thinks opposing Arab Hamas means opposing all of Islam. OBL supports the genocidal killing of blacks in Sudan. That makes him a racist in my book. What does it make him in yours?
Yes, America and the EU cut off the Hamas government financially, but how does that equate to a war on Islam? It doesn't, unless you believe that Arab Muslims are the only Muslims that matter, and that's just what OBL seems to think. How else to explain his view that cutting off Hamas means attacking Islam, even when the West maintains diplomatic and financial relations with non-Arab Muslim countries? And what about OBL's support for the murderous, Arab Muslim regime in Sudan?
In his taped message, OBL called on his supporters to join the jihad in Sudan. What he didn't mention is the fact that Sudan's Arab government is, and has been for years, waging genocide not only against black Sudanese Christians in the south, but also, in Darfur, against black Sudanese Muslims. So, in OBL's world, it's not enough to be Muslim to be the good guy, you have to be Arab and Muslim to count. All you non-Arab Muslims who think that OBL is on your side, think again. All you Black Muslims in America who believe that Islam is inherently non-racist, think again. OBL thinks opposing Arab Hamas means opposing all of Islam. OBL supports the genocidal killing of blacks in Sudan. That makes him a racist in my book. What does it make him in yours?
Monday, March 27, 2006
This Is Sharia
The case of Afghan Christian Abdul Rahman illustrates why so many people in the West fear Islam.
Rahman converted to Christianity 16 years ago while working in Germany. The new "democratic" Afghan government, whose constitution guarantees freedom of religion, is now trying him for the "crime" of converting from Islam. If found guilty, Mr. Rahman will be executed according to Sharia law. To be fair, Afghan president Harmid Karzai is trying to save Mr. Rahman's life, but the hardline mullahs who control the judicial system insist that Mr. Rahman must die for "humiliating Allah".
I hope all those moderate Muslims whom everyone keeps talking about but no one ever sees will finally get a voice and speak out against this outrage. This case shows that there is and can be no real religious, or any other kind of freedom, where Sharia rules. If Muslims think that those Danish cartoons insulted their faith, what do they think Westerners will make of executing someone for converting from one religion to another? Such an act will create far more animosity toward Islam than a few amaturish drawings ever could.
Let's be reasonable, or is reason verboten in Islam? Mr. Rahman converted to Christianity over a decade ago. If Allah was humiliated by that act don't you think he would've done something about it then? And how, exactly, does Mr. Rahman's conversion humiliate Allah? If his conversion was the result of deep soul searching and careful study of Islam's and Christianity's competing claims, isn't is possible that Allah might be pleased to see one of his creations using the brain that he gave him? Even if Mr. Rahman's conversion was purely mercenary, how does that humiliate Allah? Does it stop other Muslims from practicing their faith? Does it stop non-Muslims from converting to Islam? No, and no.
Muslims have grown in number since Mr. Rahman's conversion. There has been no loss to the dar al Islam because one man opted to think for himself and chose another faith. And that's what this is really all about. Mr. Rahman isn't facing execution for converting to Christianity; he's facing execution for thinking independently. Sharia is about punishing freedom of thought. Now the world knows that, and that really is a loss for Islam.
Rahman converted to Christianity 16 years ago while working in Germany. The new "democratic" Afghan government, whose constitution guarantees freedom of religion, is now trying him for the "crime" of converting from Islam. If found guilty, Mr. Rahman will be executed according to Sharia law. To be fair, Afghan president Harmid Karzai is trying to save Mr. Rahman's life, but the hardline mullahs who control the judicial system insist that Mr. Rahman must die for "humiliating Allah".
I hope all those moderate Muslims whom everyone keeps talking about but no one ever sees will finally get a voice and speak out against this outrage. This case shows that there is and can be no real religious, or any other kind of freedom, where Sharia rules. If Muslims think that those Danish cartoons insulted their faith, what do they think Westerners will make of executing someone for converting from one religion to another? Such an act will create far more animosity toward Islam than a few amaturish drawings ever could.
Let's be reasonable, or is reason verboten in Islam? Mr. Rahman converted to Christianity over a decade ago. If Allah was humiliated by that act don't you think he would've done something about it then? And how, exactly, does Mr. Rahman's conversion humiliate Allah? If his conversion was the result of deep soul searching and careful study of Islam's and Christianity's competing claims, isn't is possible that Allah might be pleased to see one of his creations using the brain that he gave him? Even if Mr. Rahman's conversion was purely mercenary, how does that humiliate Allah? Does it stop other Muslims from practicing their faith? Does it stop non-Muslims from converting to Islam? No, and no.
Muslims have grown in number since Mr. Rahman's conversion. There has been no loss to the dar al Islam because one man opted to think for himself and chose another faith. And that's what this is really all about. Mr. Rahman isn't facing execution for converting to Christianity; he's facing execution for thinking independently. Sharia is about punishing freedom of thought. Now the world knows that, and that really is a loss for Islam.
Saturday, March 25, 2006
Welcome to Kafir Warrior!
Welcome to Kafir Warrior! On this blog I'm going to express my dislike for Islam or, at least, certain parts of it, and explain why I feel that way. I also hope to educate my readers about the real history of Islam's interaction with the non-Islamic world and why the current clash of civilizations is NOT the West's fault. So again, welcome to Kafir Warrior, fighting Islam right!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
